Myles Lewis-Skelly red card: FA reveals why Arsenal defender’s sending off was overturned after appeal

An independent panel consisting of three people was, in their opinion, “unanimous” that Michael Oliver made a clear mistake when sending Arsenal defender Myles Lewis-Skelly at Wolves.

Lewis-Skelly was rejected in the first half of the 1-0 victory of Arsenal in Molineux last weekend, where VAR agreed with the call but his suspension of three games was withdrawn on Tuesday after the Gunners successfully registered the decision.

The panel – who rated the case after the profession of Arsenal had been submitted – thought that 'false game' was a more suitable category instead of 'serious false game' – what the reason was why Oliver sent out the 18 -year -old.

In the published written reasons for the successful profession, the panel said that Lewis-Skelly had kicked his opponent and possibly had intentionally stumbled him, but he had clearly not endangered the safety of his opponent or used excessive strength or brutality, nor used, nor used, nor used, nor used, nor used, nor was it he had emitted to his opponent “.

Moreover, the written reasons revealed that Arsenal gave evidence to support their profession, including Slow Motion and real -time video images of the tackle from different angles.

The club also showed a challenge of Wolves – midfielder Joao Gomes in the same competition, for which he received a second booking – so only a yellow card, no red.

In addition, Arsenal submitted images of red cards for Bruno Fernandes and Alexis Macallister in the past two seasons that were successfully destroyed after appeal, after 'unlawful dismissal' claims of Manchester United and Liverpool.

The red card from Fernandes against Tottenham earlier this season was destroyed for a similar-looking challenge for Lewis-Skelly while Mac Allister was fired against Bournemouth last season, but his suspension had withdrew after Liverpool had appealed.

The successful attraction of Arsenal means that Lewis -S -Skelly is available for the next three domestic matches of the Gunners – Sunday's home game with Manchester City and the Semi -Final second stage of Tuesday Carabao Cup in Newcastle – both live on Sky Sports – Plus A trip to Leicester on February 15 on February 15 on February 15 on February 15.

View: The examples that is used in Lewis-Skelly Appeal

Oliver receives online abuse after Lewis-Skelly Red Card

The reaction to Oliver's decision became so serious on social media that the PGMOL made a rare public statement on Sunday that the online abuse called it had already called for a police investigation.

“We are shocked by the threats and abuse aimed at Michael Oliver after the Wolverhampton Wanderers vs Arsenal match,” they wrote.

“No civil servant may be subject to any form of abuse, let alone the disgusting attacks aimed at Michael and his family in the last 24 hours.

“The police are aware and a number of investigations have started. We support Michael and all those who have been hit and are determined to tackle this unacceptable behavior.

“Unfortunately, this is not the first time that a competition officer has recently been tackled with threats. We will continue to support all investigations.”

Arsenal manager Mikel Arteta said: “Every time I talk about this subject, regardless of whether it is a player, a coach or a referee, it doesn't matter. We really have to work harder to try that part of it playing the game that brings nothing but bad things, bad taste and it makes people's lives more difficult.

'For everyone in football. You should not be allowed [to do that]. We don't want it, we don't need it and it certainly damages our sport. Let's get it out. “

Separately from the successful attraction, Sky Sports News understands that Arsenal will continue to support the PGMOL and Oliver about the abuse he has received.

When confirming their research, the British football police -unit in a statement said: “Questions are in the early stages and officers work closely with social media providers, including Facebook and X, to identify those responsible for the messages. “

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *