“Not in accordance with law” – La Liga to appeal Dani Olmo registration decision

On Thursday it was confirmed that Barcelona can count on Dani Olmo and Pau Victor for the rest of the 2024-25 season, with the higher sports council (CSD) pronunciation in favor of the Catalan club about the registration problem that was challenged by La Liga and the Spanish football federation.

Barcelona originally received a precautionary measure through the CSD in January, and now the case is arranged in their favor. However, this is not the end, because La Liga is not willing to take the ruling.

Hours after the decision was confirmed, La Liga has now released a statement stipulating that they will appeal against the CSD opinion.

The full explanation of La Liga is as follows:

“La Liga has learned today of the resolution of the csd, which resolves the appeal filed by fc barcelona and the players dani olmo and pau víctor on January 7, 2025, which challengeed the denial of prior visa and regse players by liga and haversed by League and haversed by League and Haversed by League and Haversed by Liga and the Rfsed theses by Leaf, Upholding the Appeal on the Basis of An Alleged Lack of Competence of the Monitoring Committee of the Coordination Agreement, La Liga considers it necessary to make the following considerations:

“1. La Liga is of the opinion that the dismissal resolution today is not in accordance with the law, including for the following reasons:

“The refusal of an earlier visa for the extension of the permits or for their re-registration is a law resulting from the automatic application of the rules for the registration of players. In this context, the agreements were adopted by the Monitoring Committee of the RFEF-LA Liga Agreement on January 4, 2025, limited. The committee.

“In any case, the decision of the monitoring committee did not replace the decisions adopted by the competent bodies of La Liga and the RFEF. In this case, the decision of the La Liga Competitions Directorate by the La Liga Manager System, which was not the subject of the previous visa, was not rejected, but the previous Visa was rejected that rejection of the previous Visa Was.

“We must not forget that the licenses of the two players went automatically on December 31, 2024, at the end of the duration of the same, agreed between the players and the club. Therefore, in no case is a federative cancellation of the same requirement.

“The competence of the CSD in the field of licenses is limited to assessing issue or refusal of licenses, but not to their cancellation or extension (art. 116.3.a and 117 LD) as the case is in the current case. Susceptible to administrative assessment.

“Bovendien negeert de resolutie van de CSD de geconsolideerde administratieve en gerechtelijke doctrine volgens welke de nietigheid van volledig recht moet worden gemanifesteerd, omdat de competentie uitdrukkelijk wordt toevertrouwd aan een andere instantie (of aan geen) en dat het niet opkomt, wanneer de toepasselijke voorschriften niet zijn Zaken van eerdere visa en de uitgifte van licenties aan een orgaan van de professionele competities en Spaanse sportfederaties en in de Resolution of the CSD there is no mention of which internal instance of La Liga or the RFEF would be competent.

“On the contrary, the action of La Liga and the RFEF in the present case is limited to the objective and literal application of the applicable regulations via the internal authorities attributed and that they have exerted and consolidated peacefully over time.

“2. The CSD has issued the resolution almost three months after submitting the appeal, that is to say the maximum legal period, without resolving the request for urgent lifting of the precautionary measure, on January 8, 2025, formulated by La Liga with its letter of accusations on January 22.

“This delay is in contrast with the extraordinary speed with which the precautions requested by FC Barcelona were requested and his players were granted in just 24 hours, and without a prior hearing of La Liga and the RFEF, which violates the principles of contradiction and defense.

“3. These measures were approved without complying with the legal requirements and procedural guarantees, thereby influencing the integrity of the competition. Moreover, it is the case law of the Supreme Court and approaches that had previously been adopted by two judicial orders of the Court of the Court of the First Construction).

“La Liga repeats its dedication to legality, competitiveness and objective application of the regulations for economic control and registration of players and therefore, La Liga, who does not consider the aforementioned resolution as in accordance with the law, will appeal immediately.”

It is still to be seen whether La Liga is successful in their appeal, but for the time being Barcelona can continue to enjoy Olmo and Victor available to head coach Hansi Flick.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *