Former Real Madrid Product and Valencia icon Santi Canizares has been heavily criticized for his comments around the Real Madrid defender Raul Asencio. The 22-year-old defender is accused of the distribution of child pornography, although the research is still ongoing.
During Real Madrid's Copa del Rey Semi-final collision with Real Sociedad, in which Los Blancos hit the 1-0 winners, Asencio was picked up during the break. Hanst van 'Asencio, who' was told by the crowd in the Reale Arena, and he was withdrawn during the break, with Carlo Ancelotti said that those songs played a role in his replacement.
The incident was a large part of the discussion after the competition, but Canizares started after his comments about the Asencio investigation.
“If you say the child, you are talking about 8, 9, 10 years old …” “or 16, which is still less,” Angel Garcia replies to Cadena Cope (as quoted by sport), but Canizares explains: “It is not the same for justice or morality.”
He then also evaluated the songs in the Reale Arena.
“It is unthinkable that people 'die' for you to sing on a football field. They sing it for an alleged crime for him. It appears that in this society that we have created I don't really know how they already know what he has done, the sentence he has, etc … When a judge has been analyzing for a year or so to make a decision. “
Before describing the alleged crime as a 'error'.
“We all made mistakes, and maybe also Asencio. If you have made a mistake, a judge will punish you. You full and that's it. And he is just another person. If the boy has made a mistake, the judge will give him a sentence that, if he fulfills it, he will just become another player. Let's not think that only because someone makes a mistake in his life, he is of no use and must be convicted seven times. “
Canizares comments regarding the age of a minor are described as 'disgusting' and 'vomit-inducing' on social media. He certainly has a point when it comes to the idea that Asencio is innocent until he has been guilty, but he starts evaluating the merits of the case, and indeed the seriousness of child pornography.
Comments